The book "The quest for new physics. An experimentalist approach" is finally available in paper format on Morebooks.de

 The book in paper format may be bought here:

THE QUEST FOR NEW PHYSICS An experimentalist approach, 978-620-4-73173-5, 6204731734 ,9786204731735 by Dmitriy Tipikin (morebooks.de)

https://www.morebooks.de/store/gb/book/the-quest-for-new-physics-an-experimentalist-approach/isbn/978-620-4-73173-5

Why this book was written? This is the experimentalist response to the crisis in fundamental physics: there are hundreds of the theories but they are still based on few core assumptions: principle of relativity, energy conservation law, observation of red shift, particle-wave dualism and many others. Even if the experiment is planned, it is based on three weak paradigms: Big Bang, dark matter and quantum entanglement.

Authors consider all three of them as obsoleted and standing in front of physics development. The book is devoted to the description of the ideas of experiments (not theories) which would create new facts and help establish finally New Physics (beyond general relativity, standard theory, modern quantum mechanics). James Webb space telescope is about to be launched and in one year it is supposed to show the blue bright first galaxies 16 billions light away with darkness below (because of Big Bang happened 16-17 billions years ago) or see nothing special: the same old galaxies with huge red shift up to James Webb limits (say 50 billions of years). No darkness, no just born stars, the same universe like near Sun but seemingly infinite. My guess that like futile search for dark matter that would be the place and suddenly all the house of cards: Big Bang, dark matter and quantum entanglement is falling down. 

But what is instead? What was missed 100 years ago why the physics is in crisis now? From author perspective much simpler objects were severely under-investigated: simple binary stars instead of galaxies will reveal the true nature of gravity on long scales (this is neither dark matter no MOND but distortion of quantum vacuum or space-time itself); the idea of tired light being resurrected but on a new physical principles: some weak but existing interaction makes the light redder and redder as it travels billions of years; the idea of spooky action will be found to be a simple experimental error (to the benefit of Einstein and Feynman); the necessity of careful and extremely expensive experiments with pulsed gravitational field will be clear (thus the author's proposal for gravito-electromagnetic national laboratory) and many other ideas of experiment in the fundamental physics.

The experimentalist approach to the new physics.

In modern physics the most discussed challenge now is crisis in fundamental physics. Indeed, numerous different theories are multiplying at exponential rate, but no further improvement was seen in already around 80 years, what indeed looks like a crisis here. One of the points every physicist agrees upon is lack of new experimental data, which would demonstrated the limitation of the major paradigms: general relativity and quantum mechanics. So the most promising way in this situation is the hard work way of experimentalist - search for new discoveries here and there without preliminary theoretical calculations to confirm - the "wild goose chase" approach.

The only way old theories may help in this situation is to create some kinds of boundaries where to search. 1.At least energy conservation law should be preserved.

2.The effect sought should be small (otherwise it would be noticed already).

3.Use the existing theory and eliminate only one assumption.

4.The experiment proposed is obligatory very expensive (otherwise it would be done decades ago).

With this approach in mind I tried to generate the list of possible areas to search within:

https://vixra.org/pdf/2011.0172v1.pdf

One of the confirmation of the validity of search come from the observation of double stars orbit - they are not really Keplerian, rather ovoid instead of ellipse (the deviation is of course small and was confirmed only recently using special technique):

https://vixra.org/pdf/2012.0180v1.pdf

Hopefully soon the search for new discoveries in this way will finally lead to new physics.

Porrima orbit is ovoid instead of ellipse - the hint to the gravitation induced space-time stretching with characteristic scale of around 0.04 light year

Introduction.

The problem of missing matter in the galaxy generated different approaches already and more approaches are possible. The startling difference between the modern theory and experimental observation comes from the observation of the deviation of the light by the mass – light bending by galaxies, clusters of galaxies etc. The most general expression for the gravity influence on light goes from Schwarzchild metric expression:

Z=GM/(c²R)

This Z value as observed is too large for the measured distance, visible mass and known gravitational constant. So the hypothesis are:

1.Missing matter – dark matter approach – value M should be higher to account for Z

2.Gravitity law is changed at high distance – combination of G and R should be reconsidered (MOND)

3.G value is wrong when away from Earth – gravity enhancing field hypothesis, fifth force hypothesis (developed in [1])

4.Speed of light is not constant and if it is smaller between galaxies the value of Z may be higher to account for the measured light bending. The speed of light theoretically may be smaller away from gravitating mass if the gravitation influences quantum vacuum much stronger than expected now – in this case not only the G constant is smaller away from galaxy (the hypothesis discussed above), but the vacuum permeability, responsible for speed of light is larger, for example, due to enhancement of positron-electron virtual pairs generation in the absence of gravitational field

5.The geometry is not correct – the value of R is wrong. For example, the Einstein’s idea that space is created by the mass is even more important and between galaxies there is virtually less space than inside galaxy – in this case the simple geometrical rules are not applicable.

               This article is devoted to the fifth approach, claiming that the distances are measured wrongly on galactic scales because the “ruler” is based on photons and the space is more distorted than expected by the presence of the mass (energy in more general terms).

Main part.

The idea proposed in [1] for experimental observation of the discrepancies connected with gravitation is rather simple: the Cavendish experiment should be performed away from gravitating mass (away from the Sun, say beyond the Pluto orbit). Modern space probes are already left the solar system, so this experiment is within the reach of modern technology. However, the simple measurement of the deviation of the expected force from the calculated one:

F=G*M₁*M₂/R²

May come not only from the difference in G as it depends from mass but also from deviation of R as it is measured away from gravitating body. If the probe is sent toward Sun, this is expected effect (general relativity will reveal itself in such measurement close to the Sun). But what if the space distorted by the presence of mass more than general relativity teaches us? What if there is another, much larger scale of influence of mass onto the space-time, in addition to Schwarzschild radius? Application of “ruler” created near Earth to the galactic and intergalactic distances than would generate the large error which is perceived as missing matter. For example, if the space is more “diluted” away from gravitating bodies (this is idea number 5 from [1]), than for stars on the outskirts of galaxy both distance measured is larger than it is in reality (from graviton point of view, for example, not from photons point of view)  and the measured velocity is larger, too (assuming in the first approximation that time is not touched) because v=dR/dt. In this case the galaxy rotation curve may be modified toward the predicted shape.

(see the picture in [5])

How this idea would reveal itself in other astronomical observations?

In this case the orbits of the binary stars are not ellipses any more, rather distorted ellipse (ovoid). Because the space is expected to be a little more “diluted” when two stars are away from each other, the ellipsoid will be deformed. (see the picture in [5])

Indeed, the observation of the binary stars which are nearby and were observed for full cycle demonstrated that the best fit ellipse is different from the real orbit in exactly this place (see the picture  from [2] for Gamma Virginis, Porrima star), in [5]

It is clearly seen that the best fit elliptical orbit is not passing through the middle or median of the numerous points when the stars are especially far from each other (those points have smaller errors because it is much easier to measure higher separation  between stars than small separation when start are almost overlap each other).

Simple mathematics may allow to evaluate the degree of the “dilution” of space when the stars are separated. For ellipse with parameters a  and b (a>b):

(x-a)²/a²+ y²/b²=1

For aphelion-perihelion line the crossing points for y=0 are 0 and 2a.

Let the distance along x axis is distorted: x → x*exp(-cx) where c<<1. This means that the space is diluted with characteristic length of 1/c when the stars are apart compare to when they nearby. In this case the shape of the figure is as follows:

(x*exp(-cx)-a)²/a² +y²/b²=1

For y=0 (aphelion-perihelion line) the new crossing points would be determined from the equation:

 

(x*exp(-cx)-a)²=a²

x*exp(-cx)-a=-a

Or x*exp(-cx)-a =a

 

The first point is still x=0 and the second point is determined from the equation: x*exp(-cx)=2a

Because c<<1 we have

exp(-cx)~1-cx

and substituting into equation x*exp(-cx)=2a

we have: x*(1-cx)=2a

or: -cx²+x-2a=0

 

The root of this quadratic equation is:

x₁=[-1+sqrt(1-8ac)]/(-2c)

The second root has no physical meaning.

 

Because c<<1 the value of 8ac<<1 and using the Maclaurin formula:

(1+x)^1/2=1+1/2*x-1/8*x² + … we have

(1-8ac)^1/2= 1-4ac-8a²c²+ …

 

Than x₁=[-1+sqrt(1-8ac)]/(-2c)=[1/(-2c)]*(-1+1-4ac-8a²c²)=2a+4a²c

The difference between the real path of the star and the pure ellipse is Δ=4a²c. The relative shift of the ellipse is Δ/2a=2ac

This relative shift is possible to see from the Fig.3. It is approximately 3/80.

For Gamma Virginis the parallax is 0.0856 and semi-major axis in arc seconds is 3.662 [3]

Then the semimajor axis in astronomical units is 3.662/0.0856=42.8 a.u.

The value of 2a=85.6 a.u.=1.28*10¹³ m

The value of c=3/80*1/(2a)=2.9*10^-15 1/m

 

The characteristic length would be ξ=1/c=3.4*10¹⁴ m (0.036 light year), what correlates with the value of the decay length of the gravity deduced in [1,4] from the mass-luminosity curves analysis: 3.2*10¹⁴ m. Because the gravity law has inverse squares  of distance in Newton formula it means that the characteristic length of space dilution should be twice small compare to the decay of the gravity to lead to the same numerical value of force.

 

Conclusion.

For the advancements in understanding of gravity and how it leads to the rotation curves of the galaxies, in addition to the attempts to detect the dark matter more accurate measurements of the binary stars orbits are necessary. The deviations in the gravity laws, easily visible on the galactic scale must reveal itself in the dynamic of smaller objects, like binary stars, despite possibly in tiny amounts. From historic perspective the analysis of simple object like binary star (but performed with high accuracy) may lead to the crucial discoveries faster than the analysis of much more visible phenomena on galaxy or Universe scale because of the extreme complexities associated with larger objects. Described here analysis may be performed by professional astrophysicists for much broader range of binaries to find the possible deviations from pure elliptical orbits.

 

References.

1.D.S.Tipikin “The quest for new physics: an experimentalist approach”// https://vixra.org/pdf/2011.0172v1.pdf

2. http://stars.astro.illinois.edu/sow/porrima.html

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_Virginis

4.D.S.Tipikin “Analysis of slope of mass-luminosity curves for different subsets of binaries – dark matter, MOND or something else governs the accelerated rotation of galaxies?” //

https://vixra.org/pdf/2008.0217v1.pdf

5.D.S.Tipikin  "Careful analysis of the binary stars orbits may reveal the space-time distortions on medium scale." 

 https://vixra.org/pdf/2012.0180v1.pdf

or:

https://vixra.org/abs/2012.018